Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 8;8(10):e76787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076787

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the association between RASSF1A promoter methylation and ovarian cancer.

Cancer Normal M-H pooled OR D+L pooled OR Heterogeneity
Group M+ N M+ N OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) I2 (%) P τ2
Total 364 763 32 438 11.17 (7.51–16.61) 9.26 (5.30–16.19) 29.0 0.153 0.27
Population subgroup
Asians 249 510 22 314 13.97 (8.54–22.85) 14.76 (5.73–38.01) 55.0 0.038 0.74
Caucasians 115 253 10 124 6.85 (3.46–13.58) 5.97 (2.96–12.05) 0.0 0.724 <0.01
Case sample size
<50 90 216 8 142 8.93 (4.33–18.42) 6.96 (3.27–14.81) 0 0.473 <0.01
≥50 243 547 24 296 12.26 (7.62–19.72) 11.19 (4.83–25.96) 51.3 0.055 0.57
Control type
BAT 356 743 29 336 8.95 (5.91–13.55) 8.43 (4.03–17.63) 48.3 0.031 0.67
NT 164 331 3 102 16.50 (6.82–39.88) 12.82 (5.08–32.37) 0.0 0.566 <0.01

BAT: benign ovarian tissues and adjacent tissues; NT: normal ovarian tissues of cancer-free patients or healthy people.

the fixed-effects model.

the random-effects model.