Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;163(2):804–814. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222570

Table II. Flowering time of HK2 NILs carrying different alleles for HvPhyC, Vrn-H1, and Vrn-H3.

Genotypea
Line HvPhyC Vrn-H1b Vrn-H3 HvCK2αc Flowering Time ± sdd
HK2 HvPhyC-e vrn-H1 vrn-H3 H 24.6 ± 1.1p
NIL (HvPhyC-e) HvPhyC-e Vrn-H1 vrn-H3 N 21.1 ± 1.3q
NIL (HvPhyC-l) HvPhyC-l Vrn-H1 vrn-H3 N 30.0 ± 0.9r
NIL (Vrn-H1) HvPhyC-l Vrn-H1 vrn-H3 N 33.8 ± 1.1s
NIL (Vrn-H3) HvPhyC-e vrn-H1 Vrn-H3 H 16.4 ± 1.8t
NIL (Vrn-H1, Vrn-H3) HvPhyC-l Vrn-H1 Vrn-H3 N 16.2 ± 1.3t
a

All lines carry Vrn-H2 (winter allele), Ppd-H1(early-flowering allele), and Ppd-H2 (early-flowering allele) in common.  bAll the dominant alleles for Vrn-H1 are identical with HvVRN1-10 (Hemming et al., 2009). They were derived from the var. Indo Omugi except for the allele in NIL (Vrn-H1, Vrn-H3) that was derived from the Japanese var. Marumi 16.  cH and N indicate the alleles from HK2 and NIL (Vrn-H1), respectively.  dApril 1 = 1. Values with different letters (p, q, r, s, or t) indicate significant difference (P < 0.01) by the Tukey test.