Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2013 Sep 6;163(2):999–1011. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.219774

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2013 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 6. — Relative hydraulic conductance () versus ionic strength () for our theoretical predictions, van Doorn’s model, and published experimental data. Theoretical models shown (10-nm pore radius and KCl electrolyte): this work, density of chargeable sites (solid line); this work, (dashed line); and van Doorn et al. (2011), dash dot line). Experimental data shown (species, electrolyte, and figure in reference): (1) Chrysanthemum and KCl (Fig. 3 in van Ieperen et al., 2000; red squares); (2) Q. robur with petioles and various salt solutions (Fig. 1A in Aasamaa and Sõber, 2010; green circles); (3) C. erectus and NaCl, (Fig. 3 in López-Portillo et al., 2005; blue triangles); (4) L. nobilis, KCl, and average value of (Fig. 1C in Zwieniecki et al., 2001; purple triangles). Experimental data were normalized to the largest measured conductance in the particular species and report. [See online article for color version of this figure.]

Inline graphic — Relative hydraulic conductance () versus ionic strength () for our theoretical predictions, van Doorn’s model, and published experimental data. Theoretical models shown (10-nm pore radius and KCl electrolyte): this work, density of chargeable sites (solid line); this work, (dashed line); and van Doorn et al. (2011), dash dot line). Experimental data shown (species, electrolyte, and figure in reference): (1) Chrysanthemum and KCl (Fig. 3 in van Ieperen et al., 2000; red squares); (2) Q. robur with petioles and various salt solutions (Fig. 1A in Aasamaa and Sõber, 2010; green circles); (3) C. erectus and NaCl, (Fig. 3 in López-Portillo et al., 2005; blue triangles); (4) L. nobilis, KCl, and average value of (Fig. 1C in Zwieniecki et al., 2001; purple triangles). Experimental data were normalized to the largest measured conductance in the particular species and report. [See online article for color version of this figure.]