Table 2.
Parameter | Assignable points | Unilateral design | Bilateral design |
---|---|---|---|
Filling | [0–4] | 0.476±0.590 [0–3] |
0.927±0.821* [0–3] |
Integration | [0–3] | 1.933±0.800 [0–3] |
1.229±0.421* [1–2] |
Matrix staining | [0–4] | 0.410±0.958 [0–3] |
2.802±0.929* [1–4] |
Cellular morphology | [0–5] | 2.295±0.980 [0–5] |
4.017±0.975* [2–5] |
Architecture defect | [0–4] | 0.800±0.924 [0–4] |
1.601±1.074* [0–4] |
Architecture surface | [0–3] | 1.333±1.157 [0–3] |
1.535±0.598 [0–3] |
Subchondral bone | [0–4] | 1.124±1.026 [0–3] |
3.101±0.636* [1–4] |
Tidemark | [0–4] | 3.800±0.526 [1–4] |
3.903±0.297 [3–4] |
Total score | [0–31] | 12.171±3.215 [6–21] |
19.115±2.672* [8–24] |
Unilateral design: one joint operated per animal; bilateral design: both joints operated within the same animal. Values are given as mean±standard deviation as well as range of point values (square brackets). *p<0.001 for unilateral versus bilateral design.