Table 4. Disparity of rEI and TEE for men and women (20–74 years).
Disparity between rEI and IOM TEE US Men & Women (20–74 years) NHANES I – NHANES 2009–2010 | ||||||
NHANESSurvey Year | Sex | EstimaterEI minus TEE (mean)* | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval (CI) | Validity: 95% CI includes zero (Y = Yes, N = No) | |
Lower | Upper | |||||
NHANES I | Men (n = 4652) | −290.8 | 20.3 | −330.7 | −250.9 | N |
Women (n = 7709) | −479.7 | 14.5 | −508.1 | −451.3 | N | |
NHANES II | Men (n = 5236) | −323.2 | 17.8 | −358.1 | −288.3 | N |
Women (n = 6006) | −505.8 | 11.6 | −528.4 | −483.1 | N | |
NHANES III | Men (n = 6122) | −183.3b | 19.1 | −220.8 | −145.7 | N |
Women (n = 7127) | −325.3a | 13.5 | −351.7 | −298.8 | N | |
NHANES 1999–2000 | Men (n = 1600) | −285.3 | 37.7 | −359.3 | −211.4 | N |
Women (n = 1886) | −328.7a | 27.3 | −382.3 | −275.1 | N | |
NHANES 2001–2002 | Men (n = 1782) | −270.3 | 26.8 | −322.9 | −217.7 | N |
Women (n = 2029) | −306.0a | 15.5 | −336.3 | −275.6 | N | |
NHANES 2003–2004 | Men (n = 1671) | −255.6 | 24.7 | −304.0 | −207.3 | N |
Women (n = 1838) | −308.2a | 27.2 | −361.5 | −254.8 | N | |
NHANES 2005–2006 | Men (n = 1749) | −232.2 | 25.3 | −281.8 | −182.6 | N |
Women (n = 1998) | −347.5a | 20.8 | −388.4 | −306.6 | N | |
NHANES 2007–08 | Men (n = 2154) | −355.0 | 32.1 | −417.9 | −292.0 | N |
Women (n = 2306) | −379.4d | 28.5 | −435.3 | −323.5 | N | |
NHANES 2009–2010 | Men (n = 2319) | −330.9 | 22.7 | −375.4 | −286.4 | N |
Women (n = 2532) | −366.9a | 9.8 | −386.1 | −347.7 | N | |
All Surveys | Men (n = 27285) | −281.4 | 9.1 | −299.3 | −263.5 | N |
Women (n = 33431) | −364.6 | 7.0 | −378.3 | −351.0 | N |
All estimates are weighted means.
Significantly different from NHANES I at p≤0.001 (Women).
Significantly different from NHANES I at p≤0.001 (Men).
Significantly different from NHANES I at p≤0.05 (Men).
Significantly different from NHANES I at p≤0.05 (Women).
Note: TEE = estimated total energy expenditure; IOM = Institute of Medicine; rEI = reported energy intake; BMR = Basal Metabolic Rate calculated via Schofield predictive equation.
These values were calculated by subtracting the IOM TEE from the NHANES rEI. Negative values indicate the kilocalorie-per-day (kcal/day) value of underreporting.