Table 4. Mean class dependent classification rates (in percent) for all 13 activities and overall mean classification rates of proposed system and state-of-the-art systems [17], [19]–[21], [23], [32].

	[17]	[21]	[32]	[23]	[20]	[19]	Proposed
SI	83.1	83.7	81.8	65.5	67.7	38.1	88.9
LY	94.5	87.6	94.7	98.2	100.0	57.4	100.0
ST	80.7	60.2	64.0	65.6	48.6	44.4	89.8
WD	88.9	79.0	–*	75.4	56.0	89.6	98.1
VC	66.9	17.7	–*	36.0	39.2	42.9	85.4
SW	81.2	57.8	–*	60.7	62.6	54.3	89.9
WK	96.2	93.0	98.7	74.3	97.6	88.1	99.0
AS	79.5	18.6	–*	28.5	70.6	29.3	95.5
DS	73.1	16.4	–*	44.2	60.2	35.3	95.2
RU	100.0	98.3	–*	92.7	97.2	94.4	100.0
BC50	48.1	50.4	–*	40.2	64.3	47.8	69.1
BC100	48.5	11.7	–*	46.2	41.7	48.3	53.5
RJ	99.4	93.4	–*	76.6	86.7	33.3	100.0
mean	80.0	59.1	84.8	61.8	68.7	54.1	89.6

Best results are printed bold.

^*The algorithm of (Karantonis et al. [32]) was not applied to all activities, as activity optimized features were used.