Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Feb 7;179(2):247–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.027

Table 3.

Effects of standard template mixtures on template detection by the non-edited probe. Ct values for the non-edited probe were measured for the non-edited template alone and for various combinations of A, B, and D templates, with or without the non-edited template. Ct Difference = Ct − Ct (non-edited template only). In the upper section, Ct Difference reflects cross-hybridization due to the presence of the mismatched templates: cross-hybridization = [1/(2Ct Difference)] × 100%. In the lower section, cross-hybridization is not calculated because binding of the probe to the matched template predominates. Each Ct value is the average of three replicates; results are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Template combination Ct value Ct Difference Cross-hybridization (%)
No matching template
 None >35.000
 A >35.000 >10.000 <0.1
 B >35.000 >10.000 <0.1
 D 29.383 ± 0.073 4.204 ± 0.094 5.084–5.789
 A + B >35.000 >10.000 <0.1
 A + D 32.021 ± 0.692 6.842 ± 0.695 0.538–1.411
 B + D 31.301 ± 0.250 6.112 ± 0.260 1.199–1.719
 A + B + D 30.686 ± 0.560 5.507 ± 0.563 1.488–3.248
With matching template
 Non-edited 25.176 ± 0.059 0.000 ± 0.084
 Non-edited + A 25.298 ± 0.050 0.119 ± 0.078
 Non-edited + B 25.521 ± 0.172 0.342 ± 0.182
 Non-edited + D 25.083 ± 0.140 −0.095 ± 0.152
 Non-edited + A + B 25.248 ± 0.331 0.069 ± 0.337
 Non-edited + A + D 25.172 ± 0.127 −0.007 ± 0.140
 Non-edited + B + D 25.283 ± 0.069 0.104 ± 0.091
 Non-edited + A + B + D 25.401 ± 0.038 0.222 ± 0.070