Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 May 6;54(11):3926–3934. doi: 10.1021/jm2002487

Table 3.

Effects of Steroids 1, 2 and Structural Analogues on Tadpole Righting and Swimming Reflexesa

Compound Tadpole
LRR
EC50 (µM)
Tadpole LRR
nHill
Tadpole
LSR
EC50 (µM)
Tadpole
LSR
nHill
1b 1.12 ± 0.14 −3.38 ± 2.28 5.48 ± 0.11 −33 ± 0c
2b > 10 Noned
3b 0.72 ± 0.11 −1.49 ± 0.26 5.48 ± 0.12 −33 ± 0
4b 1.04 ± 0.14 −1.77 ± 0.38 5.48 ± 0.12 −33 ± 0
5a 3.22 ± 0.03 −16 ± 1.8 None
5b 3.98 ± 2.43 −2.76 ± 3.73 None
5c 3.58 ± 1.59 −3.21 ± 5.34 None
6a 1.44 ± 0.20 −2.84 ± 0.77 5.48 ± 0.20 −33 ± 0
6b 9.15 ± 5.37 −1.70 ± 1.15 17.3 ± 0.17 −36 ± 0
6c 2.71 ± 0.26 −2.47 ± 0.64 5.48 ± 0.20 −33 ± 0
6d 2.09 ± 0.12 −2.42 ± 0.24 > 10
a

The methods are as reported previously. 25 Error limits are calculated as standard error of the mean (N = 10 or more animals at each of five or more different concentrations).

b

These values are from the literature.21

c

LSR typically has a very steep dose–response curve and the nHill values reflect the fact that at 3 µM (10 µM for compound 6b) all or nearly all animals had a swimming response and at 10 µM (30 µM for compound 6b) the animals did not.

d

None indicated that all animals had a swimming response at 10 µM of the test compound.