Table 6.

Performance comparison for the imbalanced S. cerevisiae data set.

	AUC					Precision					Recall					F-measure					MCC
CMIM32	0.825	*	(+)	(+)		0.744	*		(+)		0.369	*		(+)		0.493	*		(+)		0.450	*		(+)
mRMR31	0.821	(−)	*	(+)		0.738		*			0.372		*	(+)		0.495		*	(+)		0.449		*	(+)
Hwang(10)	0.775	(−)	(−)	*		0.743	(−)		*		0.343	(−)	(−)	*		0.469	(−)	(−)	*		0.432	(−)	(−)	*
Acencio(23)	0.707	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.675	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.121	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.204	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.228	(−)	(−)	(−)
N4	0.744	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.782					0.327	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.461	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.439	(−)	(−)
N5	0.727	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.741	(−)			(−)	0.387	(−)	(−)		(+)	0.509	(−)	(−)		(+)	0.461	(−)	(−)		(+)
N6	0.730	(−)	(−)	(−)		0.752	(−)				0.395	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.518	(−)	(−)			0.472	(−)	(−)
N7	0.761	(−)	(−)		(+)	0.767	(−)				0.386	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.513	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.473	(−)	(−)
N8	0.772	(−)	(−)			0.755					0.371	(−)	(−)		(−)	0.498	(−)	(−)	(+)	(−)	0.457	(−)	(−)		(−)
N9	0.782	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.749					0.382	(−)		(+)	(+)	0.506	(−)		(+)		0.462	(−)		(+)
N10	0.781	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.751					0.399			(+)		0.521			(+)		0.474			(+)
N11	0.786	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.752					0.402			(+)		0.524			(+)		0.476			(+)
N12	0.798	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.759					0.409			(+)		0.532			(+)		0.485			(+)
N13	0.789	(−)	(−)	(+)		0.748					0.433			(+)	(+)	0.549			(+)		0.495			(+)
N14	0.802	(−)		(+)		0.749					0.397			(+)	(−)	0.519			(+)	(−)	0.471			(+)	(−)
N15	0.801	(−)		(+)		0.763					0.406			(+)		0.530			(+)		0.485			(+)	(+)
N16	0.814	(−)		(+)	(+)	0.762					0.401			(+)		0.525			(+)		0.480			(+)
N17	0.814	(−)		(+)		0.761					0.407			(+)		0.530			(+)		0.484			(+)
N18	0.811	(−)		(+)		0.751					0.411			(+)		0.531			(+)		0.482			(+)
N90	0.829	(+)	(+)	(+)	(+)	0.738		(+)	(+)		0.355		(+)	(+)	(−)	0.479	(+)	(+)	(+)	(−)	0.438	(+)	(+)	(+)	(−)

Note: With the polynomial kernel function, the values of precision, recall and MCC are reported as 0.77, 0.23, and 0.36, respectively, in the original paper of Hwang et al.⁷