Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;48(5):1750–1768. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12061

Table 2.

Effect of Birth Center Use on Maternal and Infant Outcomes (All Women, Propensity Score Analysis)

FHBC (%) (N = 872) Usual Care (%) (N = 42,987) Difference (Percentage Points) Odds Ratio
Logistic regression
 Cesarean section 19.7 29.4 −9.7 0.59**
 Use of vacuum or forceps 2.1 4.4 −2.3 0.45**
 Electronic fetal monitoring 78.1 82.2 −4.3 0.77**
 Weekend delivery 28.6 23.9 4.8 1.28**
 Preterm birth (≤36 weeks) 7.9 11.0 −3.1 0.70**
 APGAR 5 score <7 3.4 3.7 −0.4 0.92
 Low birthweight (<2,500 g) 8.0 10.0 −2.0 0.81
 Vaginal birth after cesarean section 26.7 9.4 17.3 3.50**
Linear regression Marginal Effect
 Average birthweight (g) 3,245 3,166 79 79**
 Average birthweight at term (g)§ 3,325 3,282 43 43**

*p < .05; **p < .01.

N for APGAR score at 5 minutes is smaller than the other measures due to missing values.

This analysis is restricted to women who had a previous C-section (N = 4,250 for the usual care group and N = 45 for the Family Health and Birth Center [FHBC] group).

§

Ns for term births are 803 for the FHBC group and 38,773 for the usual care group.

Usual care is the reference group.