Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 16;48(5):1750–1768. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12061

Table 3.

Effect of Birth Center Use on Maternal and Infant Outcomes (All Women, Instrumental Variables Analysis)

FHBC (%) (N = 872) Usual Care (%) (N = 56,073) Difference (Percentage Points) Marginal Effect
Bivariate probit regression
 Cesarean section 19.7 29.6 −10.0 −10.5**
 Use of vacuum or forceps 2.1 4.6 −2.5 −3.3**
 Electronic fetal monitoring 78.2 83.3 −5.1 −10.2*
 Weekend delivery 28.6 23.4 5.2 11.7*
 Preterm birth (≤36 weeks) 7.9 11.0 −3.0 −6.2**
 APGAR 5 score <7 3.4 3.6 −0.27 0.209**
 Low birthweight (<2,500 g) 8.4 10.2 −1.8 −1.6
 Vaginal birth after cesarean section 26.7 9.3 17.3 57.7**
2SLS
 Average birthweight (g) 3,245 3,164 81 76
 Average birthweight at term (g)§ 3,325 3,278 46 45

*p < .05; **p < .01.

We did not use zipcode in the propensity score reweighting for this analysis as it is the basis for the instrument, and as a result the N is larger than in Table 2.

This analysis was restricted to only women who had a previous C-section (N = 4,171 for the usual care group and N = 45 for the Family Health and Birth Center [FHBC] group).

§

N = 48,769 for average birthweight at term.