Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Apr 15;28(1):10–19. doi: 10.1037/a0032204

Table 1.

Means (and Standard Deviations) for Emotion-Regulation, Emotional Arousal and Aggression Intentions by Beverage Condition

Condition

Observed
Range
Alcohol
(n = 48)
Placebo
(n = 48)
No Alcohol
(n = 48)

Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Typical weekly alcohol use
  Frequency 0 – 7 3.33 (1.37)a 2.98 (1.56)a 3.23 (1.87)a
  Quantity 0 – 15 3.73 (2.09)a 3.05 (1.95)a 3.41 (2.73)a
Emotion regulation subscales
  Reappraisal 10 – 30 22.35 (4.07)a 22.63 (3.99)a 22.81 (3.88)a
  Suppression 4 – 18 10.19 (3.60)a 10.92 (3.07)a 9.69 (3.54)a
POMS subscales
  Intoxication 5 – 29 13.96 (5.40)a 8.98 (2.10)b 7.44 (1.03)c
  Neurological effect 4 – 20 9.13 (4.18)a 4.83 (1.58)b 4.04 (0.20)c
No. standard drinks 0 – 11 3.81 (1.86)a 2.57 (0.81)b 0.06 (0.43)c
Average emotional arousal
  Neutral scenario 0.01 – 0.56 0.23 (0.14)a 0.18 (0.13)b 0.21 (0.14)a,b
  Conflict scenario 0.04 – 0.89 0.51 (0.21)a 0.51 (0.17)a 0.49 (0.19)a
Aggression intentions
  Neutral scenario 0 – 12 0.48 (1.81)a 0.29 (1.01)a 0.17 (0.56)a
  Conflict scenario 0 – 37 3.40 (6.04)a 2.13 (2.83)a,b 1.65 (2.03)b

Note. Means with different subscripts are significantly different (p < .05). POMS = Profile of Mood States; No. standard drinks = the number of standard drinks participants estimated having consumed during the beverage administration.