Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 14;4:660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00660

Table 1.

Summary of studies that have tried to induce an association between sensory features or dimensions comparable to synaesthesia.

Study N Association (IM: intramodal; CM: crossmodal) Number of trial (over what time period) Behavioral/neural effect Conscious concurrent
Kelly, 1934 18 Tone-color (CM) 320–3000 (7 weeks) No effect No
Howells, 1944 8 Tone-color (CM) 25,000 (12 h for first 5000) Stroop-type In the odd participant
Nunn et al., 2002 12 Auditory words-colors (CM) (<1 day) No change in V4/V8 neural activity No
Elias et al., 2003 1 Digit-color (IM) (8 years) Synaesthetic Stroop effect No
Ernst, 2007 12 Visual luminance-haptic stiffness (CM) 500 (1 h) Enhanced multisensory integration Not assessed
Cohen Kadosh et al., 2009 4 Digit-color (IM) Brief hypnotic suggestion Impaired digit detection task performance Yes
Meier and Rothen, 2009 20 Grapheme-color (IM) 10 min/day—3300 trials (7 days) Synaesthetic Stroop effect No
Rothen et al., 2011 20 Grapheme-color (IM) Non adaptive, 480 trials for 10 days Priming task (stronger after adaptive training) No
20 Grapheme-color (IM) Adpative, 248 trials for 10 days
Kusnir and Thut, 2012 28 Grapheme-color (IM) 1620 trials Synaesthetic Stroop effect No
Colizoli et al., 2013a 15 Grapheme-color (IM) 45 min (× 2–3 days) read, 49,000 word book (2–4 weeks) Synaesthetic Stroop effect Weak support
Rothen et al., 2013 1 Swimming style (pictures)-color (IM) 9600 trials (20 days) Synaesthetic Stroop effect (no psychophysiological conditioning) No

N = Number of participants taking part in study.