Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;14(10):903–915. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200365

Table 4.

Plan and results for response surface methodology of EAP and EAF

Run Independent variable
Response (%)
X 1 (%) X 2 (min) X 3 (°C) X 4 Observed EAP Predicted EAP Observed EAF Predicted EAF
1 80 (+1) 50 (+1) 40 (−1) 1 (−1) 3.10 3.11 2.53 2.49
2 80 (+1) 50 (+1) 60 (+1) 3 (+1) 4.52 4.51 2.63 2.67
3 80 (+1) 30 (−1) 60 (+1) 1 (−1) 3.29 3.28 2.33 2.35
4 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 5.02 4.97 2.97 2.96
5 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.96 4.97 3.02 2.96
6 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.99 4.97 2.92 2.96
7 60 (0) 40 (0) 60 (+1) 2 (0) 4.91 4.93 3.23 3.18
8 40 (−1) 30 (−1) 40 (−1) 1 (−1) 3.79 3.79 2.85 2.81
9 80 (+1) 30 (−1) 40 (−1) 3 (+1) 4.07 4.07 2.12 2.09
10 60 (0) 30 (−1) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.90 4.91 2.93 2.89
11 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 1 (−1) 4.48 4.49 2.94 3.01
12 60 (0) 50 (+1) 50 (0) 2 (0) 5.04 5.06 2.96 3.02
13 60 (0) 40 (0) 40 (−1) 2 (0) 4.49 4.49 2.75 2.82
14 40 (−1) 50 (+1) 40 (−1) 1 (−1) 4.13 4.12 2.92 2.91
15 40 (−1) 50 (+1) 40 (−1) 3 (+1) 4.93 4.94 2.56 2.53
16 80 (+1) 50 (+1) 40 (−1) 3 (+1) 4.04 4.04 2.12 2.14
17 80 (+1) 30 (−1) 40 (−1) 1 (−1) 2.60 2.61 2.11 2.14
18 80 (+1) 50 (+1) 60 (+1) 1 (−1) 3.78 3.79 2.83 2.80
19 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 5.02 4.97 2.93 2.96
20 40 (−1) 30 (−1) 60 (+1) 1 (−1) 4.19 4.19 3.04 3.01
21 40 (−1) 30 (−1) 40 (−1) 3 (+1) 5.16 5.15 2.71 2.73
22 40 (−1) 30 (−1) 60 (+1) 3 (+1) 5.35 5.35 3.11 3.15
23 40 (−1) 50 (+1) 60 (+1) 3 (+1) 5.16 5.15 3.08 3.04
24 80 (+1) 30 (−1) 60 (+1) 3 (+1) 4.54 4.54 2.52 2.53
25 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.94 4.97 3.01 2.96
26 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 3 (+1) 5.50 5.53 2.96 2.91
27 80 (+1) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 3.95 3.95 2.38 2.35
28 60 (0) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.94 4.97 2.96 2.96
29 40 (−1) 40 (0) 50 (0) 2 (0) 4.82 4.86 2.83 2.88
30 40 (−1) 50 (+1) 60 (+1) 1 (−1) 4.55 4.54 3.18 3.21

X 1: ethanol concentration; X 2: extraction time; X 3: extraction temperature; X 4: number of extraction cycles. The coded forms of the variables are shown in parentheses