Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;10(3):258–266. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.03.004

Table 1. Basic characteristics of all included studies.

Year Author Country (ies) Type of study Sample size Female ratio (%) Follow-up time (yrs) Treatment Endpoint event
2011 Poli, et al.[9] Italy Prospective cohort study 662 36.1 3.6 Anticoagulation TE
2010 Lip, et al.[4] Europe Observational 1,084 40.8 1.0 Non-anticoagulation TE
2010 Lip, et al.[10] Global Trial cohort study 7,329 NA 1.0 Anticoagulation TE
2011 Olesen, et al.[11],* Denmark Cohort study 121,280 46.1 1.0 Non-anticoagulation TE
2011 Olesen, et al.[11],# Denmark Cohort study 112,183 NA 5.0 Non-anticoagulation TE
2011 Olesen, et al.[11], Denmark Cohort study 98,217 NA 10.0 Non-anticoagulation TE
2011 Lin, et al.[12] Taiwan, China Observational 7,920 45.9 4.5 Non-anticoagulation Stroke
2011 Sandhu, et al.[13],§ Canada Observational 4,304 NA 1.0 Anticoagulation Stroke
2011 Sandhu, et al.[13], Canada Observational 4,476 NA 1.0 Non-anticoagulation Stroke
2011 Van Staa, et al.[14] Britain Observational 79,844 49.7 2.4 Anticoagulation Stroke
2012 Friberg, et al.[15] Sweden Cohort study 90,490 NA 1.5 Anticoagulation Stroke

The study of Olesen was divided into three periods of follow-up: *1 year, #5 years, and 10 years. The study of Sandhu was divided into §anticoagulantand and non-anticoagulant subgroups. NA: not mentioned; TE: systemic thromboembolism or stroke.