Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jul 9;75(4):336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.06.031

Table 1.

Participant characteristics of the study sample (N = 169)

Variable Total sample (n = 169) Low positive affect (n = 85) High positive affect (n = 84)
Sociodemographic characteristics
Maternal age a 28.6 ± 5.6 yrs 27.2 ± 5.3 yrs 30.0 ± 5.5 yrs*
Race/ethnicity b
 Non-Hispanic White 70 (41.4%) 35 (41.2%) 35 (41.7%)
 Hispanic White 58 (34.3%) 33 (38.8%) 25 (29.8%)
 Other 41 (24.3%) 17 (20.0%) 24 (28.5%)
Annual family income b
 Under $20,000 28 (16.6%) 17 (22.1%) 11 (13.8%)*
 Between $20,000 and $50,000 43 (25.5%) 29 (37.6%) 14 (17.5%)*
 Between $50,000 and $80,000 35 (20.7%) 16 (20.8%) 19 (23.7%)*
 Over $80,000 51 (30.2%) 15 (19.5%) 36 (45.0%)*
Marital status b
 Separated/divorced from or not living with baby’s father 15 (8.9%) 13 (17.1%) 2 (2.5%)*
Pregnancy-related characteristics
Obstetric risk b 48 (28.4%) 27 (31.8%) 21 (25.0%)
Parity b (≥1) 93 (55.0%) 46 (54.1%) 47 (56.0%)

Note. A median split was performed to create high and low positive affect groups

a

values represent mean ± SD;

b

values represent frequency N (% of total sample or group)

*

difference between high and low positive affect group significant at p < .05