Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2013 May 30;117(42):10.1021/jp4020146. doi: 10.1021/jp4020146

Table 3.

Summary of the results obtained with our different studiesa

System model path ΔgPT + ΔgREF + ΔΔ gNQMb Δg Δg1W − Δg2W
PO3(−) with 1 QM H2O PM3/MM 1W PT 19.4+15.5−3.6 31.3 3.3
PO3(−) with 2 QM H2O PM3/MM 2W PT 15.3+15.5−2.8 28.0
PO3(−) with 1 QM H2O BLYP//6-31G*/MM 1W PT 6.5+21.0−1.0 26.5 4.1
PO3(−) with 2 QM H2O BLYP//6-31G*/MM 2W PT 1.4+21.0+0.0 22.4
PO3(−) with 1 QM H2O B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 1W PT 14+21−2.5 32.5 10.1
PO3(−) with 2 QM H2O B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 2W PT 1.4+21+0.0 22.4
MHDP with 2 QM H2O PM3/MM 2W PT 16.2+15.5−2.9 28.8 0.2
PM3/MM 1W PT 15.9+15.5−2.9 28.5
MHDP with 2 QM H2O B3LYP//6-31G*/COSMO 1W PT 15+21−2.7 33.3 9.6
B3LYP//6-31G*/COSMO 2W PT 3+21−0.3 23.7
B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 1W PT 12.3+21−2.2 31.1 8.7
B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 2W PT 1.4+21+0.0 22.4
MDP interpolatedc B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 2W PT→1W PT ~ 8.0
MDP with Mg2+ and 6 QM H2O B3LYP//6-31G*/MM 1W PT 18+22.5−3.3 37.2
a

Energies in kcal/mol.

b

The NQM corrections were estimated using the EVB approximation of the B3LYP/MM surface of MHDP and the QCP approach (see the main text). We obtained −2.7 kcal/mol for the 1W PT and −0.3 kcal/mol for the 2W PT. The EVB barriers were 15 and 3 for 1W and 2W respectively (better agreement with the BLYP results could be easily obtained but were not needed in view of the interpolation used here). For the other systems we estimated the corrections by interpolating the calculated NQM by the relative height of the classical barrier. That is, we used ΔΔgNQM=-2.7-(Δg-15)(2.7-0.315-3), using the results of MHDP as the basis for the linear interpolation.

c

Here the 2 kcal/mol corrections reflect the estimate the effect of moving from MHDP to MDP since in this case the negative charge of the leaving group increases the pKa of the protonated form of the oxygen that accepts the proton.