Table 1.
Algal samples used for molecular analysis
Location | Sample | APHN | DLCH | GLTR | LMNR | MCRC-AE | WRNC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | (filmt/mL) | (cells/mL) | (filmt/mL) | (filmt/mL) | (cell/mL) | (cell/mL) | |
Clear Lake | CL3(6)a | 54,950 | 312,430 | 136,982 | 2,355 | 819,540 | ND |
(4.1%) | (23.6%) | (10.3%) | (0.2%) | (61.8%) | |||
CL4(7) | ND | ND | 648,606 | 15,700 | 2,219,587 | ND | |
(22.5%) | (0.5%) | (77.0%) | |||||
S2(7) | ND | 516,137 | 1,018,537 | 406,237 | ND | ND | |
(26.6%) | (52.5%) | (20.9%) | |||||
S1(8) | 245 | 179,814 | 25,267 | 10,058 | ND | ND | |
(0.1%) | (83.5%) | (11.7%) | (4.7%) | ||||
CL1(9) | ND | 132,273 | ND | 5,888 | 153,467 | 547,538 | |
(15.8%) | (0.7%) | (18.3%) | 65.2% | ||||
Sacramento- | D16(7) | ND | 41,998 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
San Joaquin | (100%) | ||||||
Delta | D16(9) | 41,409 | ND | ND | ND | 38,858 | ND |
(51.6%) | (48.4%) | ||||||
D19(9) | 70,846 | 2,551 | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
(96.5%) | (3.5%) |
The species composition of cyanobacterial species, indicated as percentage, was determined by morphological identification (Mioni et al. 2012).
Abbreviations: APHN Aphanizomenon spp.: DLCH Dolichospermum spp.: GLTR Gloeotrichia spp.: LMNR Limnoraphis spp.: MCRC-AE Microcystis aeruginosa: WRNC Woronichinia spp: ND not detected.
aThe sampling month is shown in parenthesis in Sample ID.