Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 30;2:491. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-491

Table 1.

Algal samples used for molecular analysis

Location Sample APHN DLCH GLTR LMNR MCRC-AE WRNC
ID (filmt/mL) (cells/mL) (filmt/mL) (filmt/mL) (cell/mL) (cell/mL)
Clear Lake CL3(6)a 54,950 312,430 136,982 2,355 819,540 ND
(4.1%) (23.6%) (10.3%) (0.2%) (61.8%)
CL4(7) ND ND 648,606 15,700 2,219,587 ND
(22.5%) (0.5%) (77.0%)
S2(7) ND 516,137 1,018,537 406,237 ND ND
(26.6%) (52.5%) (20.9%)
S1(8) 245 179,814 25,267 10,058 ND ND
(0.1%) (83.5%) (11.7%) (4.7%)
CL1(9) ND 132,273 ND 5,888 153,467 547,538
(15.8%) (0.7%) (18.3%) 65.2%
Sacramento- D16(7) ND 41,998 ND ND ND ND
San Joaquin (100%)
Delta D16(9) 41,409 ND ND ND 38,858 ND
(51.6%) (48.4%)
D19(9) 70,846 2,551 ND ND ND ND
(96.5%) (3.5%)

The species composition of cyanobacterial species, indicated as percentage, was determined by morphological identification (Mioni et al. 2012).

Abbreviations: APHN Aphanizomenon spp.: DLCH Dolichospermum spp.: GLTR Gloeotrichia spp.: LMNR Limnoraphis spp.: MCRC-AE Microcystis aeruginosa: WRNC Woronichinia spp: ND not detected.

aThe sampling month is shown in parenthesis in Sample ID.