Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 16;33(42):16483–16489. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-13.2013

Table 1.

Performance was largely unaffected by interpulse interval for double-pulse trials with equal pulse strength and with unequal pulse strength

Subjects Equal strength
Unequal strength
β3 β4 β3 β4 β5
S1 −0.52 ± 0.40 (p = 0.18) 5.1 ± 6.3 (p = 0.41) 0.26 ± 0.51 (p = 0.61) −0.25 ± 4.0 (p = 0.95) −2.0 ± 4.1 (p = 0.63)
S2 −0.59 ± 0.38 (p = 0.12) 4.5 ± 5.4 (p = 0.41) −0.001 ± 0.48 (p = 0.99) 3.8 ± 3.6 (p = 0.29) −3.1 ± 3.8 (p = 0.42)
S3 −0.75 ± 0.38 (p = 0.05) 9.5 ± 5.3 (p = 0.07) 0.33 ± 0.50 (p = 0.51) 6.5 ± 3.9 (p = 0.09) −8.1 ± 3.9 (p = 0.04)
S4 0.27 ± 0.44 (p = 0.54) −3.1 ± 6.1 (p = 0.61) −0.28 ± 0.54 (p = 0.60) 0.70 ± 4.1 (p = 0.87) 4.4 ± 4.3 (p = 0.31)
S5 0.39 ± 0.41 (p = 0.35) −4.4 ± 5.6 (p = 0.43) 0.01 ± 0.51 (p = 0.99) 1.3 ± 4.0 (p = 0.75) −0.52 ± 4.0 (p = 0.90)

Each row shows the coefficients of Equation 3 (mean ± SE) and their associated p values.