Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076584

Table 1. Prediction of “direct effects” model versus observations explained by psychogenic model.

Key hypotheses re distributionof complainants Characteristic Predictions of DirectEffects Model Observations withPsychogenic Model
Spatial (geographic) Distribution of wind farmswith complaints All wind farms (especially those with>1 MB turbines) should havecomplainants Inconsistent distribution associated withpresence or absence of anti windfarm activity
Proportion of complainantsresiding around wind farms Only in those “susceptible” but shouldbe similar across all wind farms Generally very low, but higher at windfarms targeted by anti windfarm groups
Temporal Timing and latency offirst complaints Turbine exposure followed by bothacute (immediate) and chronichealth effects Absence of or long delays in reportingacute effects common