Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e75919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075919

Table 2. Direction of effect: Salience of health warnings.

Direction of Effect:
Study Type of Comparison Salience of Health Warnings (specific measure used)
Beede 1990 [50] Branded vs. standardised Favours standardised (recall of warnings)
Gallopel-Morvan 2010 [34] Branded vs. standardised Favours standardised (recall of warnings)
Germain 2010 [36] Branded vs. standardised No difference (recall of warnings)
Goldberg 1995 [37] Branded vs. standardised Multiple analyses reported in 2 papers: mixed results (recall of warnings)
Moodie 2011 [43] Branded vs. standardised Favours standardised (noticing, seriousness, believability)
Munafò 2011 [51] Branded vs. standardised Favours standardised for non smokers and weekly smokers (attention towards warnings)
Rootman 1995 [45] Branded vs. standardised Ontario sample: favours standardised for regular smokers Chicago sample: no difference (recall of warnings, seriousness of warnings)