Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 17;4:409. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00409

Table 1.

Main hypotheses that may contribute to explain contrasting growth responses to temperature in Iberian Angiosperm and Conifer trees on a large scale.

Hypotheses Angiosperms Conifers References
1.1 Eco-physiological and hydraulic traits Narrower hydraulic safety margins and higher capacity to reverse embolisms Wide hydraulic safety margins, early drought-induced stomatal closure and lower carbon gain, low stomatal conductance sensitivity to VPD Martínez-Ferri et al., 2000; Brodersen et al., 2010; Choat et al., 2012; Epron et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2012; Michelot et al., 2012; Sala et al., 2012; Brodersen and McElrone, 2013; Coll et al., 2013; Meinzer et al., 2013; Ogasa et al., 2013
1.2 Phenology Tree productivity more sensitive to growing season length Positively affected but less sensitive to growing season length Churkina et al., 2005; Piao et al., 2007; Welp et al., 2007; Delpierre et al., 2009; Richardson et al., 2010; Gómez-Aparicio et al., 2011; Coll et al., 2013
1.3 Intra- and inter-specific competition and forest succession Growth less sensitive to intra and inter-specific stand competition Growth severely reduced by intra- and inter-specific competence in small, non-dominant trees Sánchez-Gómez et al., 2008; Gómez-Aparicio et al., 2011; Carnicer et al., 2013a; Coll et al., 2013; Vayreda et al., 2013
1.4 Size, age and allometry Different growth allometry and less apical dominance Peak of crown growth reached at lower sizes Gómez-Aparicio et al., 2011; Poorter et al., 2012
1.5 Drought and temperature Angiosperm trees are able to maintain substantial transpiration levels during summer drought events Drought and heat waves often results in early stomatal closure in Mediterranean conifers Martínez-Ferri et al., 2000; de Luis et al., 2007, 2011; Zweifel et al., 2007; Eilmann et al., 2009; Camarero et al., 2010; Klein et al., 2011; n, Coll et al., 2013; Poyatos et al., 2013
1.6 Winter freezing Angiosperm trees are more vulnerable to freeze-thaw embolism Less sensitive to freeze-thaw embolism Sperry and Sullivan, 1992; Gómez-Aparicio et al., 2011; Brodribb et al., 2012
1.7 Interactions between multiple factors Yes Yes Linares et al., 2010; Gómez-Aparicio et al., 2011; Vayreda et al., 2012; Coll et al., 2013; Ruiz-Benito et al., 2013
1.8 Local adaptation, individual and provenance variation Yes Yes Rehfeldt, 1978, 1982; Santos et al., 2010; Ramírez-Valiente et al., 2010, 2011; Chmura et al., 2011; Robson et al., 2012; Alberto et al., 2013
1.9 Phenotypic plasticity Yes Yes Camarero et al., 2010; Nicotra et al., 2010; de Luis et al., 2011