Table 1.

Results from Research Questions 1 and 2: Main Effect Analyses

	Adjusted Offending Rates for Full Sample Maltreatment Groups, %		Adjusted Offending Rates for Male Maltreatment Groups, %		Adjusted Offending Rates for Female Maltreatment Groups, %
Outcome	No Maltreatment	Maltreatment	No Maltreatment	Maltreatment	No Maltreatment	Maltreatment
Adult Offending (N=1,451)	(n=1,321)	(n=130)	(n=661)	(n=61)	(n=660)	(n=69)
Any nonviolent weapons conviction	1.8	4.53*	9.23	15.8	0.05	0.8
Any violent weapons conviction	2.86	7.33*	7.68	16.49*	0.76	2.02
Any violent arrest	17.56	25.82*	32.83	37.91	7.59	16.64*
Any violent conviction	7.16	18.28***	17.59	33.67**	2.19	8.61**
Any violent conviction, adult only	5.40	12.21**	11.01	19.35**	2.04	6.77*
Juvenile/Adult Offending (N=1,451)	(n=1,321)	(n=130)	(n=661)	(n=61)	(n=660)	(n=69)
Any violent petition or conviction	13.58	29.22***	26.56	49.33***	5.69	12.91*
Any violent petition & conviction	1.44	5.40***	6.51	14.52**	0.3	3.02+

Note: All maltreatment adjusted group rate comparisons were generated via probit, main effect analyses in the StataIC 11 processor with marginal effect commands. The comparisons represent estimated percentage point differences in rates of offending across maltreatment groups. Results for the following two outcomes - any violent conviction, adult only and both violent petition & conviction – derived from one multinomial regression analysis in which the reference category included all participants with no violent petition or conviction. Study covariates were modeled as exogenous control variables in all analyses.

^***p<.001

^**p < .01

^*p < .05

⁺< .10