Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 25;112(3):362–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11713.x

Table 5.

Summary of continuous outcome measures by treatment group. Values are the mean (sd) unless stated otherwise

Outcome variable Treatment group Baseline (n = 250) 4-month follow-up (n = 220) Difference* Within group P Between groups P Effect size§ (95% CI)
Primary outcomes:
 ICIQ-UI SF Internet 10.4 (3.1) 6.9 (3.1) 3.4 (3.4) <0.001 0.27 0.99 (0.76–1.22)
Postal 10.3 (3.5) 7.3 (3.9) 2.9 (3.1) <0.001 0.95 (0.72–1.17)
ICIQ-LUTSQoL Internet 33.6 (6.8) 27.8 (6.0) 4.8 (6.1) <0.001 0.52 0.79 (0.57–1.01)
Postal 33.6 (8.2) 28.8 (7.3) 4.6 (6.7) <0.001 0.68 (0.47–0.89)
Secondary outcomes
IEF Internet 12.7 (12.0) 4.8 (7.7) 7.6 (9.1) <0.001 0.23 0.84 (0.60–1.08)
Postal 9.4 (8.6) 4.4 (6.7) 4.5 (7.1) <0.001 0.63 (0.39–0.87)
EQ5D-VAS Internet 79.1 (13.6) 83.3 (10.3) 3.7 (10.9) 0.001 0.30 0.34 (0.14–0.54)
Postal 79.2 (14.0) 81.8 (13.9) 1.9 (13.0) 0.13 0.15 (–0.04 to 0.34)
*

Based on participants with complete data on both occasions

Based on paired t-tests

Based on a mixed model analysis (ICIQ-UI SF, ICIQ-LUTS qol, and EQ5D-VAS), or a negative binomial regression (IEF)

§

Mean standardised difference.