Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 17;9(10):e1003246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003246

Figure 5. Experimental validation and analysis of differential occupancy using dPeak.

Figure 5

(A) Validation of a subset of transcription start site predictions using primer extension. Primers (Table S7 in Text S1) complementary to the mRNA sequence Inline graphic downstream of each predicted start site were Inline graphic end labeled Inline graphic and Inline graphic was used for each Inline graphic assay. RNA was isolated from either aerobic (Inline graphic) or anaerobic (Inline graphic) conditions. The sequencing ladders (G, A, T and C) were generated by dideoxy sequencing. Small arrows and filled circles depict the primer extension products. In addition to dcuA Inline graphic, a second, less abundant primer extension product (*) was identified with dcuA Inline graphic. Since this product was not identified with dcuA Inline graphic, it is possible that it corresponds to the start site of an sRNA which terminates upstream of the priming location of Inline graphic. (B) Resolution comparison of the high resolution binding site identification algorithms, using experimentally validated sites as a gold standard (extended version in Figure S9C in Text S1). (C) Summary of the analyses of Inline graphic and Inline graphic PET ChIP-Seq data. The Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic candidate regions (the first diagram) cover Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic of the E. coli genome, respectively. In the bottom diagram, the numbers in parentheses depict the set of binding events that were independently validated with predictions from the analysis of biological replicate SET ChIP-Seq.