Table 1.
Tissue masses and lipid levels after 16 wk of LF or HF diet
| Total Fat Mass, g | Epididymal Fat Mass, g | Lean Tissue Mass, g | Liver Mass, g | Liver TG, μg/mg | Serum Cholesterol, mg/dl | Serum TG, mg/dl | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LF | |||||||
| WT (n = 10) | 3.89 ± 1.78 | 0.68 ± 0.26 | 20.54 ± 1.44 | 1.37 ± 0.29 | 13.32 ± 1.30 | 75.68 ± 3.80 | 47.14 ± 1.19 |
| CCR5−/− (n = 8) | 2.71 ± 0.74 | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 19.61 ± 2.04 | 1.20 ± 0.23 | 14.33 ± 5.09 | 59.65 ± 9.32 | 47.33 ± 2.86 |
| HF | |||||||
| WT (n = 36) | 17.32 ± 3.22* | 2.13 ± 0.50* | 24.19 ± 3.23* | 2.31 ± 0.72** | 113.50 ± 10.90** | 130.30 ± 7.86** | 51.21 ± 2.54 |
| CCR5−/− (n = 39) | 17.13 ± 3.61* | 2.10 ± 0.51* | 23.72 ± 2.57* | 2.16 ± 0.58** | 105.00 ± 8.67** | 127.30 ± 9.05** | 45.25 ± 2.32 |
Data are the mean ± SE of the no. of mice in each group. LF, low fat; HF, high fat; TG, triglyceride; WT, wild type; CCR5, C-C chemokine receptor 5. WT and CCR5−/− mice were placed on a LF or HF diet for 16 wk.
P < 0.05;
P < 0.001, diet effect for comparison with respective LF groups