Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 13;305(7):E897–E906. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00177.2013

Table 1.

Tissue masses and lipid levels after 16 wk of LF or HF diet

Total Fat Mass, g Epididymal Fat Mass, g Lean Tissue Mass, g Liver Mass, g Liver TG, μg/mg Serum Cholesterol, mg/dl Serum TG, mg/dl
LF
    WT (n = 10) 3.89 ± 1.78 0.68 ± 0.26 20.54 ± 1.44 1.37 ± 0.29 13.32 ± 1.30 75.68 ± 3.80 47.14 ± 1.19
    CCR5−/− (n = 8) 2.71 ± 0.74 0.45 ± 0.14 19.61 ± 2.04 1.20 ± 0.23 14.33 ± 5.09 59.65 ± 9.32 47.33 ± 2.86
HF
    WT (n = 36) 17.32 ± 3.22* 2.13 ± 0.50* 24.19 ± 3.23* 2.31 ± 0.72** 113.50 ± 10.90** 130.30 ± 7.86** 51.21 ± 2.54
    CCR5−/− (n = 39) 17.13 ± 3.61* 2.10 ± 0.51* 23.72 ± 2.57* 2.16 ± 0.58** 105.00 ± 8.67** 127.30 ± 9.05** 45.25 ± 2.32

Data are the mean ± SE of the no. of mice in each group. LF, low fat; HF, high fat; TG, triglyceride; WT, wild type; CCR5, C-C chemokine receptor 5. WT and CCR5−/− mice were placed on a LF or HF diet for 16 wk.

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.001, diet effect for comparison with respective LF groups