Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 3;305(7):F1074–F1084. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00111.2013

Table 2.

Effects of ANG II and PE on transfer functions related to myogenic and TGF autoregulatory mechanisms

Myogenic
TGF
Frequency, Hz Fractional Gain Phase Peak, degrees Coherence at 0.05-0.1 Hz Slope of Gain Reduction, db/decade Frequency, Hz Fractional Gain
Baseline 0.23 ± 0.01 2.4 ± 0.2 78 ± 7 0.7 ± 0.03 42 ± 10 0.05 ± 0.001 0.7 ± 0.1
ANG II 0.27 ± 0.01 3.0 ± 0.2* 106 ± 6* 0.5 ± 0.03* 62 ± 6 0.04 ± 0.003 0.6 ± 0.1
Baseline 0.24 ± 0.01 2.3 ± 0.2 75 ± 7 0.7 ± 0.05 40 ± 3 0.04 ± 0.002 0.6 ± 0.1
PE 0.25 ± 0.01 1.6 ± 0.1* 59 ± 3 0.7 ± 0.06 24 ± 12 0.04 ± 0.003 0.8 ± 0.1
ANOVA effects
    Baseline vs. Drug P < 0.005 NS NS P < 0.05 NS NS NS
    ANG II vs. PE NS P < 0.005 P < 0.005 NS P < 0.05 NS NS
    Interaction P = 0.07 P < 0.001 P < 0.005 P < 0.05 P < 0.05 NS P < 0.05

Values are expressed as means ± SE. ANG II (n = 11; 125 ng·kg−1·min−1), PE (n = 8; 50 mg·kg−1·day−1). TGF, tubuloglomerular feedback; NS, not significant.

*

P < 0.05 vs. baseline.

P < 0.05 vs. ANG II.