Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 18;7:654. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00654

Table 1.

Results of the ANOVAs conducted with detection performance (A′) as dependent variable4.

Detection performance df F η2 p-value
(A)
Threat category (T) 2.04, 155 186.96 0.711 <0.001
Display condition (D) 1, 76 4.49 0.056 <0.05
Packing condition (P) 1, 76 108.12 0.587 <0.001
T × D 2.04, 155 2.43 0.031 0.09
T × P 2.04, 155 42.21 0.357 <0.001
D × P 1, 76 0.25 0.003 0.62
T × D × P 2.04, 155 1.15 0.015 0.320
(B)
View difficulty (V) 1, 76 14.23 0.158 <0.001
Threat category (T) 2.23, 170 122.89 0.618 <0.001
Condition (C) 3, 76 28.78 0.532 <0.001
V × C 3, 76 0.33 0.013 0.805
T × C 6.70, 170 5.07 0.167 <0.001
V × T 2.38, 181 52.03 0.406 <0.001
V × T × C 7.12, 181 2.66 0.095 <0.05