Skip to main content
. 2011;20(3):181–188. doi: 10.5978/islsm.20.181

Table 2: Comparison of improvement achieved by Methods 1 and 2 at 3 weeks after last treatment.

Rating Method 1 Method 2
Improvement 18 (75%) 16 (67%)
76–100% 2 (8%) 4 (17%)
51–75% 10 (42%) 9 (38%)
26–50% 5 (21%) 2 (8%)
1–25% 1 (4%) 1 (4%)
No improvement 6 (25%) 8 (33%)
Total 24 (100%) 24 (100%)