Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 3;110(41):16681–16686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312324110

Table 2.

Changes in agricultural production practices between PLDL participants and nonparticipants

Production activities PLDL participating households Nonparticipating households Simple difference Difference-in-difference (ZDID) Difference-in-difference with matching (ZDIDM)
Production activities in 2006 (before PLDL) A B A − B
 P application, kg/mu 1.98 1.96 0.03
 N application, kg/mu 17.6 12.2 5.4
 Estimated P export, kg/mu 0.022 0.003 0.019
 Estimated N export, kg/mu 0.72 0.38 0.34
 Agricultural intensification, person-days/mu 15.56 11.22 4.34
Production activities in 2010 (after PLDL) C D C − D (C − D) − (A − B)
 P application, kg/mu 2.66 2.11 0.55 0.52 (2.28)** 0.51 (2.16)**
 N application, kg/mu 20.0 12.5 7.5 2.07 (1.76)* 1.38 (1.12)
 Estimated P export, kg/mu 0.005 0.004 0.001 −0.018 (−12.14)*** −0.15 (−10.37)***
 Estimated N export, kg/mu 0.62 0.39 0.23 −0.12 (−2.82)*** −0.13 (−3.12)***
 Agricultural intensification, person-days/mu 9.15 12.17 −3.02 −7.36 (−6.53)*** −7.40 (−6.66)***

For DID results, t stats are shown in parentheses. *, **, and *** denote the differences are significant at P < 0.1, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively.