Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;29(21):2774–2780. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt461

Table 2.

Multi-profile alignment of the glycomic dataset with and without using a GP prior

Performance measure Binning without GP prior
Clustering without GP prior
Binning with GP prior
Clustering with GP prior
2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Precision 0.957 0.960 0.964 0.963 0.964 0.980 0.979 0.980 0.976 0.977 0.978 0.974 0.980 0.979 0.980 0.980
(0.007) (0.008) (0.007) (0.006) (0.007) (0.004) (0.004) (0.002) (0.003) (0.003) (0.004) (0.006) (0.003) (0.003) (0.002) (0.003)
Recall 0.766 0.783 0.770 0.780 0.796 0.906 0.910 0.913 0.848 0.856 0.830 0.837 0.904 0.904 0.907 0.908
(0.138) (0.122) (0.147) (0.154) (0.138) (0.094) (0.099) (0.092) (0.151) (0.141) (0.160) (0.156) (0.098) (0.099) (0.095) (0.096)

Note: Precision and recall are compared between cases where G chromatograms (Inline graphic) are derived either by binning along m/z or using the chromatographic clustering procedure.