Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 8;5(9):1351–1366. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201202183

Table 1.

Multivariate Cox-regression analysis reveal PRL-3 as an independent prognostic marker

Cox-regression analysis of AML patient survival

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Clinicopathological variables Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-Value Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-Value
Age (n = 221) 1.034 (1.022–1.046) <0.0001 1.032 (1.019–1.045) <0.0001
Sex
 Female (n = 112) 1 Reference
 Male (n = 109) 0.951 (0.681–1.326) 0.765
Cytogenetic risk group
 Favourable (n = 63) 1 Reference 1 Reference
 Intermediate (n = 142) 3.131 (1.950–5.026) <0.0001 2.488 (1.458–4.244) 0.001
 Adverse (n = 16) 5.528 (2.817–10.847) <0.0001 4.431 (2.067–9.499) <0.0001
Karyotype
 Normal (n = 101) 1 Reference
 Others (n = 120) 0.651 (0.465–0.911) 0.012
FLT3 mutation status
 Normal (n = 141) 1 Reference 1 Reference
 TKD (n = 29) 0.644 (0.358–1.156) 0.141 0.665 (0.355–1.243) 0.201
 ITD (n = 50) 1.920 (1.322–2.789) 0.001 1.697 (1.303–2.896) 0.001
 ITD/TKD (n = 1) 1.963 (0.272–14.155) 0.504 1.004 (0.133–7.590) 0.997
NPM mutation status
 Normal (n = 163) 1 Reference
 Mutant (n = 58) 1.319 (0.917–1.897) 0.136
PRL-3 mRNA expression 1.306 (1.041–1.639) 0.021 1.577 (1.199–2.073) 0.001
FAB group (missing; n = 10)
 FAB group 1 (n = 50) 1 Reference
 FAB group 2 (n = 64) 0.736 (0.457–1.184) 0.206
 FAB group 3 (n = 12) 0.592 (0.231–1.519) 0.276
 FAB group 4 (n = 44) 0.662 (0.392–1.116) 0.122
 FAB group 5 (n = 35) 1.073 (0.640–1.799) 0.789
 FAB group 6 (n = 4) 1.504 (0.461–4.906) 0.499
 FAB group 7 (n = 2) 6.913 (1.598–29.903) 0.010

PRL-3 acts as a novel prognostic marker in AML. By multivariate Cox-regression analysis using backward conditional stepwise method with a removal limit of p > 0.05, PRL-3 constituted one of the key independent predictors for poorer patient survival in our Cohort 1 (n = 221).