Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Jul 24;22(10):1722–1729. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0118

Table 2.

MtDNAcn (MT/S) in controls, low and high exposed cokeoven workers: comparison of high-exposed workers with controls, and trend across PAH exposure categories

Controls Coke oven workers


n= 44
low exposure
(1-pyrenol≤3)a

n =24
high exposure
(1-pyrenol>3)a

n=22
p-value
(high exposure vs.
controls)
p-value
(high exposure vs. low
exposure)
p-value
(Test for trend)
mtDNAcn (MT/S) geometric mean (95% CI) 0.89 (0.81–0.98) 0.91 (0.81–1.03) 1.06 (0.93–1.18) 0.029 0.08 0.043
mtDNAcn (MT/S) Geometric mean (95% CI), age-adjusted 0.89 (0,82–0.97) 0.90 (0.80–1.01) 1.07 (0.95–1.21) 0.016 0.06 0.032
a

Coke-oven worked were divided in low and high exposure groups using the median levels of urinary 1-pyrenol, taken as a measure of exposure to PAHs

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure