Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Planta Med. 2013 Feb 13;79(7):538–553. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328187

Table 1.

Estrogenic potency of phytoestrogens in competitive ER binding assaya.

Compoundb Plant References IC50 (µM) reported range
ER binding

ERα ERβ
17β-estradiol (E2) [89, 101, 185] 0.00001 – 0.003 0.0014 – 0.0038
genistein soy, red clover, kudzu [50, 101, 185] 0.59 – 1.145 0.025 – 0.09
daidzein soy, red clover, kudzu [9, 185, 186] 0.96 – 17 0.1 – 1.20
S-equol soy, red clover, kudzu [50, 138, 185] 0.208 – 1.02 0.016 – 0.11
kaempferol red clover [80, 186] 8.2 0.05 – 50
puerarin kudzu [187] 0.87 NDc
miroestrol kudzu [89] 0.0003 NDc
8-prenylnaringenin hops [9, 101, 188] 0.057 – 0.51 0.068 – 1.7
liquiritigenin licorice [189] 2.80 0.41
glabridin licorice [113] 5.00 NDc
glabrene licorice [190] 1.00 NDc
lindleyin rhubarb [124] 225 – 435 NDc
trans-rhapontigenin rhubarb [129] 12 5.6
desoxyrhapontigenin rhubarb [129] 26 28
apigenin chasteberry [138, 139, 186] 7.88 0.08 – 1.00
penduletin chasteberry [139] NDc 0.31
a

The values are from different studies and are included for qualitative comparison. Different methods were employed: radiometric binding assay using purified human ER [9, 50, 101, 185], florescence polarization assay using purified human ER [124, 129, 138, 189], radiometric binding assay in cells or tissues [113, 187, 188, 190], inhibition ELISA using purified human ER [186], dextran-coated charcoal method in cells [89].

b

Some compounds might not be plant-specific.

c

ND; not determined.