Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Pollut. 2013 Jul 31;182:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.011

Table 2.

Selected chemical properties of the forest soils by sub-region for the three depths sampled (± 1 standard error). The value n is number of sites.

n Thickness cm soil pH %SOM g g−1 %Clay§ g g−1 Fe mg kg−1 Fe kg ha−1
Western Region
 Forest floor 3 3.2 ± 0.5 4.48 ± 0.35 52 ± 5 n.a. 9 ± 3 0.2 ± 0.1
 Upper mineral soil 3 4.1 ± 0.6 4.43 ± 0.37 9 ± 2 11 ± 2 12 ± 6 6 ± 3
 Lower mineral soil 3 5.9 ± 0.5 4.38 ± 0.32 5 ± 1 12 ± 3 15± 6 12 ± 6
Central Region
 Forest floor 6 6.9 ± 1.4 4.24 ± 0.10 67 ± 5 n.a. 6 ± 1 0.6 ± 0.2
 Upper mineral soil 6 5.9 ± 0.4 4.10 ± 0.06 15 ± 4 12 ± 3 14 ± 4 6 ± 1
 Lower mineral soil 4 9.7 ± 1.2 4.12 ± 0.19 9 ± 3 6 ± 2 16 ± 3 20 ± 1
Northern Region
 Forest floor 9 8.7 ± 1.8 3.97 ± 0.04 73 ± 3 n.a. 4 ± 1 0.7 ± 0.2
 Upper mineral soil 9 6.4 ± 0.9 3.69 ± 0.03 9 ± 2 14 ± 2 12 ± 5 7 ± 3
 Lower mineral soil 7 7.5 ± 0.6 4.13 ± 0.14 11 ± 1 12 ± 2 28 ± 2 25 ± 2

measured in a 2:5 soil water extract

estimated from loss on ignition

§

determined by particle size distribution