. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jul 27;93(2):188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.001

Table 4.

Predicted Values of Patient Communication Patterns and Global Affect Across Patient/Clinician Ethnic Dyads (adjusting for non-communication covariates)

	Total n=34				White Dyads n=34				Latino Dyads n=24				Mixed Dyads n=35				Omni- bus₃	LLvs W₄	MIXvs WW₅	LLvs MIX₆
	predicted values	se	95% CL		predicted values	se	95% CL		predicted values	se	95% CL		predicted values	se	95% CL		predicted values	se	95% CL
Communication Pattern ₁
Medical Questions	2.28	0.215	2.26	2.34	2.90	0.464	3.01	3.19	1.37	0.564	1.11	1.33	2.43	0.416	2.20	2.36	⁺	^*
Psychosocial Questions	158.92	11.24	155.68	160.16	115.45	12.66	112.35	117.40	187.64	20.34	186.30	194.41	128.13	13.55	125.85	131.26	^***	^***		^***
Medical Information	67.90	3.693	65.42	66.93	73.11	6.154	67.58	70.09	52.13	10.25	50.43	54.61	63.70	7.873	62.25	65.46	^**	^**		⁺
Psychosocial/Lifestyle Information	387.55	18.19	382.68	390.13	338.32	24.38	333.57	343.56	371.16	32.31	367.35	380.59	352.93	24.76	346.48	356.62
Partnership & Activation Statements	13.76	1.079	13.18	13.61	13.72	2.183	13.13	14.01	4.04	4.107	2.71	4.36	16.93	2.799	16.06	17.19	^*	^*		^**
Concern Statements	49.15	5.622	50.21	52.53	36.03	3.831	34.90	36.48	59.12	17.34	59.61	66.75	32.63	5.912	31.84	34.27	^**	^**		^**
Optimism Statements	15.24	1.302	14.82	15.34	14.54	1.612	14.51	15.16	8.41	4.333	7.53	9.27	13.94	2.08	13.53	14.37	^*	^*		^*
Positive Statements	14.99	1.352	14.44	14.99	14.56	2.361	14.97	15.93	1.03	4.303	−2.09	−0.35	14.71	2.444	14.05	15.04	^***	^***		^***
Agreement Statements	82.38	4.398	81.04	82.84	85.99	7.485	84.84	87.90	70.83	13.77	65.21	70.85	78.18	8.624	76.57	80.10

Global Affect ₂
Positive Affect	3.52	0.07	3.51	3.54	3.68	0.13	3.66	3.72	2.98	0.19	2.91	2.99	3.74	0.17	3.72	3.79	^***	^***		^***
Distress	2.64	0.12	2.62	2.67	2.09	0.22	1.98	2.06	3.30	0.28	3.30	3.41	2.33	0.28	2.36	2.47

⁺

p<0.1;

p<0.05;

^**

p<0.01;

^***

p<0.001

1. Adjusting for patient talk, visit length, patient gender, days of functional limitations, diagnosis, clinician discipline and adjusting for nesting of patients within clinicians

2. Adjusting for patient gender, days of functional limitations, diagnosis, clinician discipline and adjusting for nesting of patients within clinicians

3. Omnibus test evaluating differences across dyad groups

4. Significant difference between Latino/Latino dyads vs. White/White dyads

5. Significant difference between Mixed dyads vs. White/White dyads

6. Significant difference between Latino/Latino dyads vs. Mixed dyads