Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 24;2013:340848. doi: 10.1155/2013/340848

Table 3.

Antimicrobial herbal-drug resistance of bacteria isolated from faecal droppings of geckos.

Bacteria Isolates tested Number of isolates resistant to
AC AV EG LGO PO SWO ZR
Citrobacter diversus 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 1
C. amalonaticus 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
C. freundii 43 27 42 42 43 43 42 33
Edwardsiella tarda 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4
Ed. hoshiniae 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Enterobacter cloacae 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3
Ent. agglomerans 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ent.  amnigenus BG-I 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Ent. amnigenus BG-II 3 2 2 0 1 1 2 1
Ent. cancerogenus 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ent. gregoviae 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 3
Ent. sakazaki 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Erwinia ananas 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Escherichia coli 44 39 44 44 43 42 43 41
E. blattae 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 6
E. fergusonii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Hafnea alvei 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
Klebsiella oxytoca 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
K. pneumoniae 35 27 34 35 35 35 35 32
Leminorella ghrimontii 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
Listonella damsele 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
Pragia fontium 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Proteus penneri 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Raoultella terrigena 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 1
Salmonella indica 30 18 30 29 29 27 29 28
Salmonella salamae 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Salmonella houtenae 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4
Serratia fonticola 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
Serratia marcescens 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

Total 223 161 216 211 215 211 216 192

% resistant strains 72.2 96.9 94.6 96.4 94.6 96.9 86.1

Chi-test values 0.029 3.3 × 10−12 4.7 × 10−18 4.9 × 10−14 2.9 × 10−8 1.5 × 10−10 2.8 × 10−5

All herbal antimicrobials were used as 0.5 mg/disc; AC: Ageratum conyzoides ethanolic extract; AV: Artemisia vulgaris essential oil; EG: eucalyptus gum; LGO: lemongrass oil; PO: patchouli essential oil; SWO: sandalwood oil; ZR: Zanthoxylum rhetsa ethanolic extract.

Note: Chi-square test was done to test the null hypothesis that type of bacteria had no effect on resistance to antimicrobial drug.