Table 3.
Component 1 Cup |
Component 2 RNFL |
Component 3 Rim |
|
Cup area, mm2 | 0.364 | −0.078 | 0.178 |
Rim area, mm2 | 0.012 | −0.060 | 0.777 |
Cup-to-disc area ratio | 0.336 | −0.045 | −0.039 |
Rim-to-disc area ratio | −0.336 | 0.045 | 0.039 |
Cup volume, mm3 | 0.338 | −0.034 | 0.129 |
Rim volume, mm3 | −0.051 | 0.221 | 0.506 |
Mean cup depth, mm | 0.327 | 0.164 | −0.041 |
Maximum cup depth, mm | 0.283 | 0.210 | −0.108 |
Height variation contour, mm | 0.007 | 0.382 | −0.049 |
Cup shape measure | 0.192 | −0.063 | 0.126 |
Mean RNFL thickness, mm | −0.055 | 0.482 | −0.098 |
RNFL cross-sectional area, mm2 | 0.050 | 0.442 | 0.176 |
Horizontal cup-to-disc ratio | 0.304 | 0.003 | −0.076 |
Vertical cup-to-disc ratio | 0.316 | −0.024 | −0.026 |
CLM temporal–superior, mm | 0.001 | 0.402 | −0.046 |
CLM temporal–inferior, mm | −0.027 | 0.355 | −0.023 |
Linear cup-to-disc ratio | 0.321 | −0.006 | −0.090 |
Following rotation, three components with an eigenvalue >1 explained 79.9% of the variance. The factor loadings are presented below, and based on these, the components were named cup, RNFL, and rim. Factor loading magnitudes >0.25 are in bold.