Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):931–937. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a50278

Table 1.

shows descriptive statistics for Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Decedents across the 2003-2009 study years.

2003 2009

TM MA TM Weighted to Match MA TM MA TM Weighted to Match MA

Sample Size (N): 206754 150679 189721 248676
sex Male 48.6 55.6 55.6 48.0 46.5 46.5
Female 51.4 44.4 44.4 52.0 53.5 53.5

Race White 88.0 86.4 86.4 88.1 83.3 83.3
Black 8.5 8.5 8.5 7.8 10.7 10.7
Hispanic 1.4 2.4 2.4 1.5 3.1 3.1
Other 2.1 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.9

Age 65-74 24.4 28.0 28.0 22.6 21.8 21.8
75-84 41.1 42.8 42.8 36.5 38.9 38.9
85+ 34.5 29.2 29.2 41.0 39.3 39.3

Region Northeast 19.2 23.9 23.9 18.5 23.9 23.9
Midwest 25.0 10.0 10.0 23.9 14.6 14.6
South 40.1 20.3 20.3 40.7 24.4 24.4
West 15.7 45.8 45.8 16.9 37.1 37.1

SES Urban 73.2 92.0 92.0 72.3 87.7 87.7
Below Poverty 10.2 9.3 9.3 10.9 9.5 9.5
*

TM is traditional Medicare. MA is Medicare Advantage. SES is socioeconomic status. All differences between TM and MA different at the p<0.001 level. There were no statistically significant differences after matching.