Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;6(7):1109–1118. doi: 10.1111/eva.12090

Table 2.

Conditions necessary to declare local adaptation (LA), general adaptation (GA), or local maladaptation (as defined here) and their frequencies in one-on-one comparisons of populations A and B (local versus nonlocal) at sites A and B in two meta-analysis studies. Population A originates at site A, and population B originates at site B. Note that GA may occur in either of two ways (population A is generally superior across sites A and B, or population B is generally superior across sites A and B). The terminology and associated conditions employed here differ from the terminologies and conditions of both meta-analysis papers, which also differ from one another (see footnotes)

Superior population

At site A At site B Leimu and Fischer (2008) Hereford (2009)
LA* A B 45% 48%
GA A A 51% 43%
GA B B
Local maladaptation B A 3% 9%
Number of one-on-one comparisons (n) 1032 892
Local superior to nonlocal 71% 71%
*

Referred to as ‘POS-POS’ by Leimu and Fischer (2008) or ‘fitness trade-off’ by Hereford (2009).

Referred to as ‘NEG-POS’ or ‘POS-NEG’ by Leimu and Fischer (2008) or ‘no trade-off’ by Hereford (2009).

Referred to as ‘maladaptation’ or ‘NEG-NEG’ by Leimu and Fischer (2008) or ‘inverse trade-off’ by Hereford (2009).