Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):367–377. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00009

Appendix Table 1.

Characteristics of the 39 Systematic Reviews on the Management of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Characteristic Value
Median year published (range) 2007 (2000–2009)

Type of interventions examined, n(%)*
  Medical intervention vs. medical intervention or placebo 24 (61.5)

  Laser trabeculoplasty vs. medical intervention 1 (2.6)

  Laser trabeculoplasty vs. filtering surgery or medical or no intervention 1 (2.6)

  Filtering surgery vs. medical intervention 1 (2.6)

  Filtering surgery vs. filtering surgery 11 (28.2)

  Cyclodestructive surgery vs. cyclodestructive surgery 1 (2.6)

Outcome examined, n(%)*
  Intraocular pressure 34 (87.2)

  Visual field 7 (18.0)

  Safety 30 (76.9)

  Other outcomes 19 (48.7)

Type of studies included, n(%)*
  Randomized, controlled trials 36 (92.3)

  Non-randomized, controlled trials or observational studies 5 (12.8)

Search
  Databases searched, n (%)*
    MEDLINE (PubMed) 39 (100)

    EMBASE 31 (79.5)

    Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 27 (69.2)

    LILACS 6 (15.4)

    Other databases 14 (35.9)

  Median databases searched (IQR), n 3 (2–4)

  Reported searching non-English-language studies, n (%) 26 (66.7)

  Searched all possible years for ≥1 database, n(%) 34 (87.2)

  Other sources searched, n (%)*
    Searched reference lists or reports that cited the study 29 (74.4)

    Contacted experts in the field or study authors 11 (28.2)

    Searched hard-to-access or unpublished studies 14 (35.9)

    Searched ongoing studies 10(25.6)

  Searches completed within 2 y of review publication, n (%) 35 (89.7)

  Searches updated after review publication, n(%) 5 (12.8)

Results of systematic reviews*
  Median studies included (IQR), n 11 (8–19)

  Median participants included (IQR), n 1310 (758–2187)

  Synthesized evidence qualitatively, n (%) 26 (66.7)

  Performed ≥1 meta-analysis, n (%) 32 (82.1)

  Assessed statistical heterogeneity, n (%) 22 (68.9t)
Funding sources, n(%)*

  No funding 14 (35.9)

  Industry 6 (15.4)

  Government 8 (20.5)

  Other sources of funding 2 (5.1)

  Not reported 11 (28.2)

IQR = interquartile range.

*

Totals may be >39 because systematic reviews could be counted in ≥1 category.

The denominator was the 32 systematic reviews with ≥1 meta-analysis.