Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetologia. 2011 Feb 17;54(5):1147–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2065-0

Table 2.

Percentage changes in individual and total diacylglycerol by intervention group

DAG species DIWLa EXb
C14:0/16:0 −31.6±12.6* −41.3±16.0*
C14:0/18:0 −17.1±20.9* −42.9±12.7*
C14:0/18:1 −22.2±13.1* −57.6±12.9*
C16:0/18:0 −21.4±10.6* −34.2±12.7*
C16:0/18:1 −8.5±13.1* −51.8±11.1*
C16:1/18:0 −16.9±11.1 −63.9±8.9*
C16:1/18:1 −27.8±14.4* −66.5±10.7*
C18:0/18:1 −15.3±5.8* −57.8±9.9*
DI-C14:0 −41.2±8.6* −58.1±10.9*
DI-C16:0 −26.7±10.8* −52.9±14.7*
DI-C16:1 −41.3±15.3 −55.0±16.2*
DI-C18:0 −8.8±18.4 −48.4±13.9*
DI-C18:1 −22.8±8.8* −64.1±11.2*
Total DAG −12.4±14.7* −40.9±12.0*

Data are mean ± SEM

A two-way (group×time) repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess differences

Data were log-transformed when ANOVA assumption of normality was not met

a

n=8; three men/five women;

b

n=8; four men/four women

*

p<0.05 within-group intervention;

p<0.05 between-groups difference