TABLE I.

Responses to eight items on the targeted peer-reviewer questionnaire

Item	Reviewer rating (n=3)
	Lowest quality				Highest quality
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
Rate the guideline development methods.	0	0	0	2	1
Rate the guideline presentation.	0	0	0	0	3
Rate the guideline recommendations.	0	0	0	1	2
Rate the completeness of reporting.	0	0	0	1	2
Does this document provide sufficient information to inform your decisions? If not, what areas are missing?	0	0	0	2	1
Rate the overall quality of the guideline report.	0	0	0	1	2
	Strongly disagree	Neutral			Strongly agree
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
I would make use of this guideline in my professional decisions.	0	0	0	1	2
I would recommend this guideline for use in practice.	0	0	0	1	2