Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;20(5):e448–e454. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1357

TABLE III.

Clinical outcomes for each chemotherapy regimen in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma

Regimen 1st- or 2nd-line therapy Median os (months) Median pfs (months) Response rate, cr+pr [% (95% ci)] Grades 3–4 toxicity (%)
Doxorubicin5,a 1st and 2nd 12.1 nr 25 (9–41) Leukopenia: 16
Thrombocytopenia: 4
Questionable cardiac toxicity: 3 (no detail)
Gemcitabine6,b 2nd nr nr 21 (7–31) Leukopenia: 27
Thrombocytopenia: 11
Red blood cell transfusion: 9
Neurotoxicity: 5
Pulmonary toxicity: 5
Cardiovascular toxicity: 5 (no detail)
Gemcitabine plus docetaxel79,c 1st and 2nd 14.7–16.1 4.4–6.7 27 to 53 (15–42 to 35–70) Leukopenia: 14–23
Thrombocytopenia: 14–40
Red blood cell transfusion: 43–50
Neurotoxicity: 0–6
Pulmonary toxicity: 0–8
Gemcitabine versus 1st and 2nd nr 4.9 18 (2–34) nr
  Gemcitabine plus docetaxel (abstract)d 1st and 2nd nr 6.0 23 (8–38) nr
a

Adverse effects were assessed using study-defined criteria.

b

Standard Gynecologic Oncology Group response criteria were used for toxicity grading.

c

The U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria were used for toxicity grading.

d

Duffaud F, Pautier P, Nguyen BB, et al. A pooled analysis of the final results of the 2 randomized phase ii studies comparing gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine+docetaxel in patients with metastatic/relapsed leiomyosarcoma [abstract 898573]. Presented at the Connective Tissue Oncology Society 16th Annual Meeting; Paris, France; November 11–13, 2010.

os = overall survival; pfs = progression-free survival; cr = complete response; pr = partial response; ci = confidence interval; nr = not reported.