Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 22;8(10):e78432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078432

Table 1. Parameter values, optimization metric, and evaluation metric used in each of the included datasets.

Study Method Subjects N Steps ISI (ms) Gap (s) Opt Eval
Kaper (22) all 8 36 1 140 2 ITR ITR
Serby (11) all 6 36 1 150 2 ITR SR, ACC, ITR
Blankertz (16) 2 6 2 NA NA none OCM
Sellers (6) 3×3,175 5 9 1 175 5 none ITR
3×3,350 5 9 1 350 5 none ITR
6×6,175 5 36 1 175 5 none ITR
6×6,350 5 36 1 350 5 none ITR
Furdea (14) auditory 13 25 1 625 3.75 WSR ITR, WSR
visual 13 25 1 287.5 8.75 WSR ITR, WSR
Ceocetti (17) 8 5 ≥3 NA NA none ACC, ITR, OCM
Townsend (3) all 18 72 1 125 3.5 WSR ITR, PBR
Jin (4) all 10 84 1 175 2 none ACC, PBR
Ryan (12) all 24 72 1 125 6 WSR ITR, OCM
Schreuder (15) S1 14 6 2 175 18.25 none ACC, ITR, OCM
S2a, S2b 14 6 2 175 12 none ACC, ITR, OCM
Speier (13) all 6 36 1 125 3.5 ITR ITR