Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2013 Aug 13;119(21):3847–3853. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28305

Table 3.

Predictors of change in county-level mammography capacity, 2000-2010

Characteristic Coefficient p
Mammography capacity, 2000 −0.630 <0.0001
Proportion age 65+, 2000 0.372 NS
Change in proportion age 65+ −3.709 <0.0001
Proportion black, 2000 −0.046 NS
Change in proportion black 0.830 NS
Proportion at or below poverty, 2000 0.119 NS
Change in proportion in poverty −1.108 0.0007
Proportion without high school diploma, 2000 −0.777 <0.0001
Change in proportion without diploma −0.185 <0.01
Proportion rural, 2000 0.139 0.0027
Change in proportion rural −0.060 NS
Proportion uninsured, 2000 −0.046 NS
Change in proportion uninsured −0.350 NS
Medicare managed care penetration, 2000 −0.273 <0.01
Change in managed care penetration −0.161 <0.05
Population density, 2000 −0.038 <0.0001
Change in population density −0.557 <0.0001
Primary care physicians per 100,000, 2000 −0.012 NS
Change in primary care physicians per 100,000 −0.002 NS
Radiologists per 100,000, 2000 −0.001 NS
Change in radiologists per 100,000 0.007 NS
Hospital beds per 100,000, 2000 0.040 <0.0001
Change in hospital beds per 100,000 0.046 <0.0001

Notes:

The adjusted impact of each county characteristic on change in county mammography capacity was estimated in a linear regression model where the dependent variable was the natural log of change in capacity between 2000 and 2010. All characteristics shown here were included in the model. The estimated coefficients for each predictor in can be interpreted as impacts on the rate of change in county mammography capacity.

NS: not statistically significant at p<0.05.