Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Nov;37(11):1728–1736. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2ab

Table 2. Univariate Logistic Regression Results Modeling Lymph Node Metastases or Extrauterine Disease.

Variable Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value
Age at diagnosis (continuous) 0.99 (0.97 – 1.00) 0.2718
Tumor ≥ 2.0 cm 13.77 (3.26 – 58.09) 0.0004
FIGO grade 2 vs 1 1.58 (0.85 – 2.95) 0.1496
Lower uterine segment involvement 3.40 (2.05 – 2.66) <0.0001
Cervical stromal involvement 5.72 (3.18 – 10.28) <0.0001
#Pelvic lymph nodes 1.02 (1.00 – 1.05) 0.0945
#Para aortic lymph nodes 1.09 (1.03 – 1.15) 0.0045
% Solid component (continuous) 1.02 (1.00 – 1.04) 0.0592
>20% Solid component 1.59 (0.93 – 2.72) 0.0899
Papillary architecture present 1.80 (1.07 – 3.04) 0.0276
%Myometrial invasion (per 10%) 1.36 (1.24 – 1.49) <0.0001
>50% Myometrial invasion 3.49 (2.10 – 5.79) <0.0001
MELF pattern invasion present 3.77 (2.25 – 6.33) <0.0001
Single cell invasion present 5.21 (2.77 – 9.81) <0.0001
Lymphovascular invasion 12.61 (6.87 – 23.15) <0.0001