Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Dec 11;17(2):257–266. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7

Table 2.

Analysis of SEER patients in subgroups of examined lymph nodes

≤5 lymph nodes 6–12 lymph nodes ≥13 lymph nodes p value
n 6,789 (46 %) 4,272 (29 %) 3,846 (25 %)
Primary site
 Head 71.1 % 82.4 % 85.6 % <0.01
 Body/tail 28.9 % 17.6 % 14.4 %
Mean tumor size (±SD) 42.6 (±31.5)a 37.4 (±23.1)b 38.4 (±24.1)c pab, ac<0.01, pbc=0.124
AJCC T stage
 Tis 3.2 % 2.1 % 1.8 % <0.01
 T1 9.2 % 6.3 % 5.4 %
 T2 21.4 % 17.4 % 15.1 %
 T3 51.9 % 68.4 % 71.7 %
 T4 14.3 % 5.8 % 6.1 %
AJCC N stage
 N0 55.9 % 41.9 % 30.8 % <0.01
 N1 44.1 % 58.1 % 69.2 %
Regional nodes examined (±SD) 1.66 (±1.78) 8.8 (±1.97) 19.86 (±7.44) <0.01
Regional nodes positive (±SD) 0.68 (±0.96) 1.5 (±1.8) 2.9 (±0.17) <0.01
Mean lymph node ratio (±SD) 0.27 (±0.37) 0.17 (±0.21) 0.15 (±0.17) <0.01
Lymph node ratio
 No positive nodes 55.9 % 41.9 % 30.8 % <0.01
 <0.2 4.2 % 26.9 % 40.4 %
 0.2–0.3 3.9 % 9.2 % 11.8 %
 ≥0.3 36.0 % 22.0 % 17.0 %

pab is the p value for the difference between a and b. Similarly for pac and pbc