Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Dec 11;17(2):257–266. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7

Table 3.

Analysis of single-institution patients in subgroups of examined lymph nodes

≤9 LN lymph nodes 10–16 lymph nodes ≥17 lymph nodes p value
n 301 301 300
Primary site
 Head 72.9 % 85.5 % 82.8 % <0.01
 Body/tail 27.1 % 14.5 % 17.2 %
Mean tumor size (±SD) 38.2 (±28.5) 34.6 (±18.7) 33.6 (±19) 0.456
AJCC T stage
 Tis 0 % 0.3 % 0 % <0.001
 T1 12.6 % 8.4 % 7.1 %
 T2 40.0 % 24.6 % 15.2 %
 T3 43.9 % 63.6 % 74.4 %
 T4 3.5 % 3.0 % 3.3 %
AJCC N stage
 N0 45.6 % 39.6 % 27.5 % <0.01
 N1 54.4 % 60.4 % 72.5 %
Regional nodes examined (±SD) 5.74 (±2.3) 13.3 (±2.2) 23.2 (±4.6) <0.01
Regional nodes positive (±SD) 1.1 (±1.4) 1.8 (±2.2) 3 (±3.1) <0.01
Mean lymph node ratio (±SD) 0.22 (±0.37)a 0.14 (±0.17)b 0.13 (±0.14)c pab, ac<0.01, pbc=0.897
Lymph node ratio
 No positive nodes 45.6 % 39.6 % 27.5 % <0.01
 <0.2 15.6 % 32.5 % 45.9 %
 0.2–0.3 7.8 % 12.8 % 14.0 %
 ≥0.3 30.9 % 15.1 % 12.7 %

pab is the p value for the difference between a and b. Similarly for pac and pbc