Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Dec 11;17(2):257–266. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7

Table 4.

The impact of lymph node parameters (numbers and ratio) on overall survival in a Cox multivariate model

SEER ≤5 lymph nodes p value 6–12 lymph nodes p value ≥13 lymph nodes p value
Numbers of positive lymph nodes, HR (95 % CI)
 No positive node Reference category
 One positive node NS 1.46 (1.11–1.92) 0.007 1.09 (0.77–1.53) 0.637
 Two positive nodes NS 1.24 (0.9–1.71) 0.196 1.44 (1.03–2.01) 0.032
 Three or more positive nodes NS 1.62 (1.23–2.14) <0.001 1.72 (1.33–2.24) <0.001
Lymph node ratio, HR (95 % CI)
 LNR=0 Reference category
 LNR<0.2 NS 1.3 (1–1.17) 0.048 1.28 (0.9–1.67) 0.071
 LNR, 0.2–0.3 NS 1.5 (1.03–2.18) 0.035 1.6 (1.14–2.25) 0.007
 LNR≥0.3 NS 1.69 (1.29–2.23) <0.001 2.27 (1.67–3.08) <0.001
 Single institution (MGH) ≤9 lymph nodes p value 10–16 lymph nodes p value ≥17 lymph nodes p value
Numbers of positive lymph nodes, HR (95 % CI)
 No positive node Reference category
 One positive node 1.56 (0.98–2.48) 0.058 1.25 (0.80–1.96) 0.326 1.27 (0.55–2.92) 0.56
 Two positive nodes 1.72 (1.05–2.79) 0.028 2.47 (1.53–4.00) <0.001 1.38 (0.69–2.76) 0.36
 Three or more positive nodes 2.54 (1.55–4.18) <0.001 2.03 (1.38–2.99) <0.001 2.36 (1.34–4.18) 0.002
Lymph node ratio, HR (95 % CI)
 LNR=0 Reference category
 LNR<0.2 1.42 (0.85–2.41) 0.183 1.95 (1.31–2.88) 0.001 2.70 (1.47–4.95) <0.001
 LNR, 0.2–0.3 1.29 (0.66–2.53) 0.461 2.10 (1.29–3.43) 0.003 2.18 (1.02–4.65) 0.044
 LNR≥0.3 2.07 (1.36–3.15) 0.001 1.85 (1.14–2.99) 0.012 4.95 (2.47–9.92) <0.001

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, NS not significant

Age, gender, race/ethnicity, year of diagnosis, size, grade, and T stage of tumor were used as covariates in separate Cox models for each lymph node variable